Back to Overview

Analysis of the Differences between Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel Materials in the Manufacturing of Bag Dust Collectors

Jul 09,2025

In the production of bag filters, carbon steel and stainless steel are two commonly used core materials, and their performance differences directly affect the applicable scenarios, service life, and operating costs of the equipment. For overseas users, clarifying the difference between the two is the key to selecting suitable equipment based on operating conditions.
Analysis of the Differences between Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel Materials in the Manufacturing of Bag Dust Collectors

In the production of bag filters, carbon steel and stainless steel are two commonly used core materials, and their performance differences directly affect the applicable scenarios, service life, and operating costs of the equipment. For overseas users, clarifying the difference between the two is the key to selecting suitable equipment based on operating conditions.

Material composition and basic performance

Carbon steel is mainly composed of iron, with a carbon content between 0.02% and 2.11%. Some models may add elements such as manganese and silicon to enhance strength, but it does not contain corrosion-resistant components such as chromium and nickel. It has outstanding mechanical properties, high tensile strength, and high hardness, suitable for withstanding structural pressure during equipment operation.
Stainless steel adds chromium (content ≥ 10.5%) to carbon steel, and some models also add elements such as nickel and molybdenum. The addition of chromium forms a passivation film, giving it excellent corrosion resistance; Nickel element further enhances toughness and low temperature resistance, while molybdenum enhances resistance to chloride ions (such as 316L stainless steel).

Comparison of Corrosion Resistance

Carbon steel has poor corrosion resistance and is prone to rusting in humid environments. If it comes into contact with acidic or alkaline dust or gases (such as corrosive exhaust gases in the chemical industry), oxidation corrosion will occur, resulting in thinning of the shell and air leakage. In severe cases, anti-corrosion maintenance (such as painting with anti rust paint) should be carried out once every 1-2 years.
Stainless steel has significantly better corrosion resistance than carbon steel due to the protection of passivation film. 304 stainless steel can withstand general atmospheric environment and weak acid and alkali dust; 316L stainless steel can be used for a long time in highly corrosive conditions such as high salt spray environments and chlorine containing exhaust gases at the seaside, with a service life of more than 10 years, and does not require frequent anti-corrosion treatment in daily life.

Differences in applicable scenarios

Carbon steel material is suitable for the following working conditions:
1. Dry and non corrosive dust environment, such as in industries such as grain processing and wood processing;
2. Process normal temperature (≤ 100 ℃) and neutral dust (such as coal gangue dust);
3. Small and medium-sized enterprises with limited budget and regular maintenance.
Stainless steel material is more suitable for:
1. Damp and high humidity environments (such as steam dust from food processing);
2. Corrosive working conditions containing acid, alkali, and salt spray, such as chemical, electroplating, and dust removal equipment in coastal areas;
3. High temperature (304 stainless steel temperature resistance ≤ 650 ℃, 316L ≤ 800 ℃) or high hygiene requirements (such as the pharmaceutical industry).

Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis

The initial procurement cost of carbon steel is relatively low, about 50% -70% of stainless steel of the same specification, but it needs to be included in long-term maintenance costs (such as rust removal and painting every 2-3 years, with a single cost of about 10% -15% of the total equipment price).
Stainless steel has a higher initial investment, but its service life is 3-5 times that of carbon steel, and its maintenance cost is extremely low. For equipment that operates in corrosive environments for a long time, stainless steel has a higher overall cost-effectiveness. For example, in the chemical workshop, the total investment (procurement+maintenance) of stainless steel dust collectors over 10 years is about 60% of that of carbon steel, and it can avoid downtime losses caused by equipment corrosion.

Processing and installation characteristics

The welding, cutting and other processing techniques of carbon steel are simple and suitable for large-scale production. The installation requires low tool requirements, and ordinary welding equipment can operate it.
Stainless steel welding requires the use of specialized welding wires (such as ER308, ER316) and processes such as argon arc welding to avoid oxidation in the heat affected zone. The processing difficulty is slightly higher and the cost is slightly higher than that of carbon steel processing, but it can ensure the corrosion resistance of the weld seam.

summarize

When selecting the material for a bag filter, it is necessary to make a comprehensive judgment based on the corrosiveness, temperature, humidity, and budget of the working conditions. Carbon steel is suitable for low-cost scenarios that are dry and non corrosive, while stainless steel is a long-term choice for high corrosion and high humidity environments. Overseas users can choose the most cost-effective material solution based on local environmental requirements (such as mandatory equipment lifespan regulations in some countries) and operating costs.

Hot Tags:

Request a Quote

We will contact you within one working day. Please pay attention to your email.

SUBMIT

Request a Quote

We will contact you within one working day. Please pay attention to your email.

SUBMIT

Request a Quote

We will contact you within one working day. Please pay attention to your email.

SUBMIT